Nussbaum Mind. Stories today. Skills for life.

The Reference She Cannot Give

Chapter 1The Blank Beside Reliability

The form has five lines. Tirtza likes four of them.

Name of applicant. How long known. Relevant skills. Name of reference.

Between skills and signature comes the fifth: Can this applicant be relied on to arrive at the agreed time?

Chaviva, seventeen, stands beside the classroom window while Tirtza reads.

"Mrs. Adler says she needs somebody to help prepare the younger girls' craft sessions. Just supplies, not being in charge of children. Two afternoons a week. It's paid."

"That sounds good."

"You know what my folders look like. Tell her I'm organized."

Tirtza knows the folders. Chaviva labels everything, keeps scissors where scissors belong, and can prepare twenty sets of paper without giving nineteen girls the wrong color.

Tirtza also knows the last three supervised class-project afternoons. Chaviva is late to two and absent from one without telling the teacher until afterward. Each time, Tirtza rearranges the shared work.

She looks at the fifth line.

"I can't say yes to that one."

Chaviva stops smiling.

Chapter 2The Part That Is True

"It's only a reference," Chaviva says.

"That's why she's asking."

"I'm not applying to run the school."

"She needs the supplies before the children arrive."

Chaviva takes the form back.

"You could say I'm usually reliable."

Tirtza almost accepts usually. It is a comfortable word. It has enough room to hide the afternoons neither girl wants to discuss.

"I don't have experience of that," she says. "I can write about how carefully you prepare things. I can't promise arrival times."

"Friends are supposed to help."

"I want to help honestly."

The sentence sounds like something from a school poster. Tirtza dislikes hearing herself say it. She wishes there is a less polished way to give an answer Chaviva does not want.

"You know what I mean," she adds.

Chaviva folds the form.

"I thought I did."

She leaves for the next lesson.

Tirtza spends most of the lesson thinking about a blank she has not even filled in.

Chapter 3A Reference Is Not a Verdict

At home, Tirtza asks Mama to read the form's wording without naming the applicant.

Mama's green tichel covers all her hair. She wears a high-necked blouse and a long skirt, and she sits at the table with the page between them.

"If I can't answer this," Tirtza says, "am I saying she's a bad person?"

"What does it ask?"

"Whether she arrives at an agreed time."

"Then answer about that, or say you aren't the right reference. You aren't being asked to judge her whole character."

"She might have reasons for being late."

"Then she can discuss what she chooses to discuss with the person offering the role. Don't guess the reasons for her."

Tirtza thinks about all the ways she can soften the fifth line. She also thinks about Mrs. Adler setting out tables and waiting for prepared supplies.

The friend is real. So is the person who relies on the answer.

"Can I just not fill it in?"

"You can decline to be a reference. Tell your friend clearly, rather than leave her thinking the form is coming."

Tirtza writes two possible answers on a scrap. She keeps them specific. Neither contains always, never, or the word irresponsible.

Chapter 4The Conversation They Do Not Finish

The next morning, Chaviva does not sit beside Tirtza at break.

Tirtza waits until they are alone near the classroom door.

"I won't fill in a reliability statement I can't support," she says. "I can give a reference limited to your supply work, if that's useful and Mrs. Adler accepts that. Or you can ask someone else."

"That sounds worse than saying nothing."

"Then don't use me for the reference. I don't want you expecting the form from me."

Chaviva looks down at her folder.

"I need the job."

Tirtza knows that makes the answer matter more. It does not make her experience different.

"I'm sorry it's difficult."

"You could make it less difficult."

"Not by saying that."

They go into class. They do not reach an agreement that makes everyone comfortable.

Tirtza does not tell the other girls why Chaviva sits elsewhere. She does not turn the reference into a story about how principled she is. At lunch, she puts Chaviva's borrowed ruler back on her desk. It still belongs there.

Chapter 5A Smaller Answer

Two days later, Chaviva comes to Tirtza with a fresh sheet.

"Mrs. Adler says a skills-only reference is useful, but she will still need to check the timing question separately. I told her you can't answer that."

Tirtza reads the revised request.

It asks what tasks she sees Chaviva complete, and how carefully.

"I can answer this."

"Let me read it before you give it in."

"Yes."

Tirtza writes that she works beside Chaviva on three supervised classroom projects. Chaviva sorts materials accurately, labels sets clearly, and leaves tools in their assigned places. Tirtza does not write that Chaviva completes work at times she does not meet.

Chaviva reads the page.

"It sounds smaller than I hoped."

"It's specific."

Chaviva points to one sentence. "The folders are for the history display, not the reading display."

Tirtza checks her notes and corrects it.

Being careful about one claim does not make all her other claims automatically right.

They agree on the exact limited reference. Mrs. Adler receives it in the way she requests. Chaviva speaks to her separately about schedules and the role's expectations.

Tirtza does not attend that conversation. It is not hers to manage.

Chapter 6Not Her Decision

A week later, Chaviva says she does not get the fixed-afternoon role.

Tirtza feels a pull to apologize for the entire result.

"I'm sorry you didn't get it."

"She's looking for somebody with experience of being on time for something regular. She says I can ask about a supervised preparation trial later, if there is an opening."

"Do you want to?"

"Maybe. Not today."

Tirtza nods.

"I'm still annoyed with you," Chaviva says.

"I know."

"But I don't think you should have written something false."

Tirtza wants to make that sentence the end of the problem. Chaviva's first sentence is still there too.

They walk down the stairs together. At the bottom, Chaviva turns toward the office, and Tirtza goes to the courtyard.

There is no reason to pretend they need the same route to prove anything.

Chapter 7The Folder Between Them

On the next class project, the teacher asks pairs to choose their work.

Chaviva asks Tirtza to join her.

"We should write down which parts are each of ours," she says.

They choose a display with three sections. They arrange two supervised work periods and tell the teacher who will bring each supply. Tirtza does not promise to finish Chaviva's parts if she misses one.

Chaviva arrives on time for the first period. Tirtza does not congratulate her as if punctuality is an unexpected trick.

They work.

At the second period, Chaviva arrives on time again. Tirtza is pleased. Two afternoons are evidence of two afternoons, not a lifetime guarantee. If someone asks her later, she can describe the new experience accurately.

When they finish, Chaviva closes the folder.

"You can say this one is the history display."

Tirtza laughs. "I have that written down."

"Good."

They carry their own parts to the teacher's desk.

How the request changes

Number these moments from 1 to 6. Mark the moment that shows careful claims still need factual checking.

Chaviva asks for a skills-only reference and corrects one factual detail.
Tirtza sees the timing question on the original form.
The friends arrange clear responsibilities for their next class project.
Tirtza offers either a limited reference or a clear refusal.
Chaviva says she does not get the fixed-afternoon role.
Tirtza asks Mama how to separate a specific reference from a verdict on a person.

Which claim can she support?

Label each statement E (supported by Tirtza's experience), G (a guess or overclaim), or D (a decision belonging to someone else). Rewrite one overclaim as a specific statement that includes its limits.

StatementYour label
"Chaviva prepares materials accurately on the projects Tirtza sees."
"Chaviva will always arrive on time in the new role."
"Mrs. Adler should give Chaviva the job."
"Chaviva is late or absent at three earlier project periods."
"Chaviva is a bad person because of those periods."
"The two later project periods add two new examples of punctual arrival."
Question or explanation

A reference without a rescue promise

Choose useful steps and draw arrows between their boxes. More than one route may fit; do not choose every box automatically.

Start
A friend requests an endorsement you cannot fully support.
Read what the recipient actually needs to know.
Substitute usually for evidence you do not have.
Distinguish observed skills from predictions.
Offer a limited reference if it is useful, or decline clearly.
Let the friend decide whether to use the limited wording.
Give an agreed, checked account only within that scope.
Manage the employer's separate decision for the friend.
Leave room for disappointment without inventing a guarantee.
Finish
The recipient gets truthful, relevant information and the friend knows what is, and is not, being offered.

What tension does not prove

For each clue, write an observation, an unsupported interpretation, and a useful next action. Use fictional characters. No real friend's reliability, job application, or private difficulties need to be named. Discomfort does not decide whether an endorsement is accurate.

ObservationWhat is not establishedQuestion / next action
Story clue: Chaviva stops smiling at the fifth line.
Story clue: Tirtza keeps thinking about the form during the lesson.
Story clue: Chaviva says she is still annoyed but agrees the reference should not be false.

Write the smaller, truer statement

Fictional evidence: - A teen sorts three supervised supply sets accurately. - The teen labels folders clearly. - The observer sees two late arrivals and one missed session. - The observer does not know the reasons. Write a skills-only reference of two or three sentences. Do not predict punctuality, guess reasons, or attach a character label. Then write a sentence declining to answer a timing endorsement the observer cannot support. Optional: Add a correction if you discover that one named project is described incorrectly. A careful tone does not replace checking the detail.

Skills-only reference (two or three sentences)
Declining an unsupported timing endorsement
Optional factual correction

Reminders beside the signature

What did I actually observe?
Specific is not unkind.
A limit is not a verdict.
Do not predict beyond evidence.
Check the small detail too.
Their decision stays theirs.

Choose one for the initial form and one for the revised reference. Explain why a real need for a job does not supply missing evidence.

Leave room for an honest limit

Draw an object-only line-art scene: a five-line reference form, a project folder, a pencil, and a separate employer decision page. Shade the form's supported statements differently from its unanswered question. Add labels "Observed," "Not established," and "Recipient's decision." Do not draw the applicant as good or bad based on a blank.

Your scene, labels and captions

Find the reference words

Find eight words, all left to right. Connect two to specific choices in the story.

QSKILLMNPR
FACTBCDFGH
DLIMITFHJK
TIMELMNOPQ
RCHECKWXYZ
TRUTHBDFHJ
KSCOPELMNP
CHOICEPQRS
FOLDERABCD
PENCILEFGH
SKILLFACTLIMITTIMECHECKTRUTHSCOPECHOICE

Parent notes and answers

This is not a prompt to report on classmates or diagnose reliability from limited information. It concerns a requested reference and the observer's limits. Private explanations belong to the applicant, and hiring belongs to the responsible employer. Do not grade a teen by whether the friend stops being upset.

Three questions: Which strengths can Tirtza describe? Why is declining a timing endorsement different from condemning Chaviva? What changes when they arrange the next project clearly?

One tool: Divide a requested endorsement into observed facts, unverified predictions, and decisions that belong to the recipient. Offer only the part that is accurate and useful, with the person's understanding of that scope. A clear decline is kinder than leaving a false expectation.

1. Listed order: 4, 1, 6, 3, 5, 2. Correcting the display name shows the small facts need checking too.

2. A-E, B-G, C-D, D-E, E-G, F-E. Example limit: "I see accurate supply preparation in three supervised projects; I cannot endorse punctual arrival from that experience."

3. Use read question, distinguish facts/predictions, limited offer/decline, applicant choice, checked scoped account, allow feelings. Reject unsupported usually and managing the employer's decision.

4. A does not prove intent to deceive. B does not establish the refusal is wrong. C can contain both feelings; agreement does not require instant forgiveness. Useful actions include clarifying scope, listening, and keeping private details out of gossip.

5. Example: "I work beside the applicant on three supervised supply projects. The materials are sorted accurately and folders labeled clearly. This reference concerns those preparation skills only." Decline: "I cannot endorse punctual arrival from the work periods I observe." Do not invent reasons for lateness.

6-7. Open responses. Avoid character rankings or a promise of hiring.

8. SKILL row 1 columns 2-6; FACT row 2 columns 1-4; LIMIT row 3 columns 2-6; TIME row 4 columns 1-4; CHECK row 5 columns 2-6; TRUTH row 6 columns 1-5; SCOPE row 7 columns 2-6; CHOICE row 8 columns 1-6.

Print bookPrintable activities